And so, with Underhill as my guide, I pulled out some of the most insane bits of legal lunacy from each. Regardless, they do offer something to the annals of legal history - namely, they’re the most absurd and hilarious court documents ever filed. The Froot Loops and Crunch Berries lawsuits never amounted to much, as they were deemed to be entirely frivolous (and one was tossed out on legal technicalities). He adds that while these kinds of laws make it easier to sue companies for wrongdoing, they can result in absurd cases as well. “All of them were brought under California’s Consumer Protection Law,” explains Kevin Underhill, a partner at the law firm Shook, Hardy & Bacon and the author of The Emergency Sasquatch Ordinance: And Other Real Laws That Human Beings Actually Dreamed Up. As ridiculous as this sounds, these claims were strong enough - or at least presented the prospect of a big enough payday - to attract several different law firms, as there were a total of seven of these nearly identical lawsuits from 2007 to 2010. But despite their obvious contributions to the American (breakfast) experience, both came under assault about a decade ago by people claiming the mascots had been knowingly deceitful.īeginning in 2007, multiple Californians declared that they were tricked by Froot Loops and Crunch Berries because, due to the names of the cereals, they believed the cereals contained a significant amount of real fruit. In 1963, each launched a new fruity breakfast cereal that quickly became part of the very fabric of this country. One is a respected seaman the other is a beloved immigrant. For nearly 60 years, Cap’n Crunch and Toucan Sam have served the public honorably.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |